Innovation Unleashed: Measuring the Effectiveness of Atal Incubation Centres in Nurturing Women Entrepreneurs

Siva Prakash C. S.; Jaya Verma; Reshmi Ghosh; Surya Kant Sharma; Hitumoni Nath; Ruhul Amin; Ajanta Das

doi:10.24857/rgsa.v18n9-055

Autores

Siva Prakash C. S. https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4537-939X
Jaya Verma https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3681-4351
Reshmi Ghosh https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0098-6075
Surya Kant Sharma https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3269-6674
Hitumoni Nath https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7777-915X
Ruhul Amin https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3887-9594
Ajanta Das https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7777-915X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n9-055

Palavras-chave:

Atal Incubation Centres, Women Entrepreneurship, Startup Ecosystem, Initiatives, Factors, Challenges, Gender Inclusivity, Entrepreneurial Journey, Innovation Support, Policy Enhancement

Resumo

Purpose: The manufacturing industry has been at the cutting-edge of technology advancements, which has Background: This research delves into the impact of Atal Incubation Centres (AICs) on women entrepreneurship, aiming to understand the driving initiatives behind female participation in the startup ecosystem. Recognizing the imperative role of AICs in shaping entrepreneurial landscapes, the study addresses the need to assess their specific contributions to fostering women-led ventures.

Objective: The study sets out to achieve several key objectives, including the identification of AIC programs that support women entrepreneurs, the exploration of factors that enhance female involvement in startups facilitated by AICs, and the analysis of challenges faced by women entrepreneurs within this ecosystem.

Method: Employing a dual-methodology approach, the research relies on both primary and secondary data sources. Primary data is gathered through meticulously crafted questionnaires, allowing for a firsthand understanding of the experiences and perspectives of women entrepreneurs associated with AICs.

Findings: The synthesis of primary and secondary data aims to provide a concise yet thorough analysis of AICs' effectiveness in fostering women entrepreneurship. By shedding light on specific programs, influential factors, and challenges encountered, the research endeavors to contribute valuable insights to policymakers, researchers, and aspiring women entrepreneurs.

Conclusion: This comprehensive investigation seeks to inform the ongoing discourse on women entrepreneurship and innovation. By offering nuanced insights into the measures implemented by AICs, factors fostering increased female participation, and the challenges faced, the research provides a foundation for crafting effective strategies to create a more inclusive and supportive startup ecosystem for women.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Aldrich, H. E., & Martinez, M. A. (2001). Many are called, but few are chosen: An evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 41–56. doi:10.1177/104225870102500404

Brush, C. G., & Cooper, S. Y. (2012). Female entrepreneurship and economic development: An international perspective. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 24(1–2), 1–6. doi:10.1080/08985626.2012.637340

Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B., Shaver, K. G., & Gatewood, E. J. (2003). The career reasons of nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 13–39. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00078-2

De Bruin, A., Brush, C. G., & Welter, F. (2006). Advancing a framework for coherent research on women’s entrepreneurship. *Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30*(5), 725–737.

Duflo, E. (2012). Women’s empowerment and economic development. *Journal of Economic Literature, 50*(4), 1051–1079.

Gatewood, E. J., Carter, N. M., Brush, C. G., Greene, P. G., & Hart, M. M. (2003). Women entrepreneurs: Moving front and center: An overview of research and theory. In *Women Entrepreneurs and the Global Environment for Growth* (pp. 1–32). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Hisrich, R. D., & Brush, C. G. (1985). The woman entrepreneur: Management skills and business problems. *Journal of Small Business Management, 23*(4), 30–37.

Jennings, J. E., & McDougald, M. S. (2007). Work-family interface experiences and coping strategies: Implications for entrepreneurship research and practice. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 747–760. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.25275510

Kabeer, N. (2005). Gender equality and women’s empowerment: A critical analysis of the third Millennium Development Goal 1. Gender and Development, 13(1), 13–24. doi:10.1080/13552070512331332273

Kanter, R. M. (1977). *Men and women of the corporation*. Basic Books.

Marlow, S., & McAdam, M. (2013). Gender and entrepreneurship: Advancing debate and challenging myths; exploring the mystery of the under-performing female entrepreneur. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 19(1), 114–124. doi:10.1108/13552551311299288

Minniti, M., & Nardone, C. (2007). Being in someone else’s shoes: The role of gender in nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 28(2–3), 223–238. doi:10.1007/s11187-006-9017-y

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). *The Pursuit of Gender Equality: An Uphill Battle*. OECD Publishing.

Rosa, P., & Carter, S. (1998). Economic transitions in female entrepreneurship. *International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 18*(9/10), 128–160.

Shinnar, R. S., Giacomin, O., & Janssen, F. (2012). Entrepreneurial perceptions and intentions: The role of gender and culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(3), 465–493. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00509.x

Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance, 17(3), 320–337. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00742.x

Thébaud, S. (2015). The new entrepreneurship in France: Explaining the rise in self-employment. *Economy and Society, 44*(4), 493–517.

Verheul, I., & Thurik, R. (2001). Start-up capital: Does gender matter? *Small Business Economics, 16*(4), 329–346.

Welter, F., & Smallbone, D. (2011). Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior in challenging environments. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 107–125. doi:10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00317.x

Wennberg, K., Wiklund, J., DeTienne, D. R., & Cardon, M. S. (2010). Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial exit: Divergent exit routes and their drivers. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(4), 361–375. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.01.001

Wilson, F., Kickul, J., & Marlino, D. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurial self‐efficacy, and entrepreneurial career intentions: Implications for entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 387–406. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00179.x

Woldie, A., & Adersua, I. (2004). Female entrepreneurs in a transitional economy: Businesswomen in Nigeria. *International Journal of Social Economics, 31*(9/10), 861–876.

Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128(5), 699–727. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.699

Zahra, S. A., & Wright, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship’s next act. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(4), 67–83. doi:10.5465/amp.2010.0149

Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. E. (2006). The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 259–271. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.259