Policy and Competitiveness of Integrated Agricultural-Based technology for Cocoa Production in Indonesia: Application of a Policy Analysis Matrix

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n9-006

Keywords:

Cocoa, Intercroping, Comparative, Competitive of Cocoa

Abstract

Purpose: The research aimed to evaluate the competitiveness of smallholder cocoa plantations and the efficiency of input use in cocoa farming by strengthening farmer groups Indonesia.

 

Theoretical framework: The research design includes the steps taken in conducting research, data sources, and how to obtain data and data analysis. The research clearly describes the variables, data collection, and data analysis methods to have a clear picture of the competitiveness of cocoa farming.

 

Design/methodology/approach : Measuring the competitiveness of cocoa in Bali using the Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) method. PAM analysis is used to calculate private profit, which is a measure of farm competitiveness at the market price level or the actual price

 

Findings: Competitiveness at the social price level is placed on the second row of the PAM table, Indonesia is an agricultural country and the development of the main agricultural sector, especially cocoa commodities which are managed through community plantations in rural areas, shows the ability to be comparatively competitive, even competitive, even though some components such as private farmer profits can be achieved at 69% compared to what cocoa farmers should receive. Farmers can receive social benefits of up to 40%. Even though cocoa production receives output subsidies, cocoa farmers are only able to obtain a price of 79%, or 21% lower than the world cocoa price, but it is still competitively profitable for farmers. The inputs needed by farmers in cocoa production can be managed by farmers so that the price of tradable inputs at the farmer level shows the same price at the economic level so that it is said to have comparative and competitive competitiveness.

 

Research,  Practical  &  Social  implications: Competitive cocoa in Indonesia provides benefits to farmers at small-scale plantations of up to 69 %, and the profits received by farmers are 40% when measured comparatively.

 

Originality/value: Originality/Value: This research is original. Implemented in smallholder cocoa plantations in Indonesia with integrated crop-livestock farming patterns to produce outputs that can compete at social prices and to motivate other cocoa farmers to develop farming system innovations that can increase cocoa production based on local resources.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aneani, F., Anchirinah, V. M., Owusu-Ansah, F., & Asamoah, M. (2012). Adoption of Some Cocoa Production Technologies by Cocoa Farmers in Ghana. Sustainable Agriculture Research, 1(1), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.5539/sar.v1n1p103

Arndt, C., Pauw, K., & Thurlow, J. (2016). The economy-wide impacts and risks of Malawi’s farm input subsidy program. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 98(3), 962–980. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aav048

Beg, M. S., Ahmad, S., Jan, K., & Bashir, K. (2017). Status, supply chain and processing of cocoa - A review. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 66, 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.06.007

Budiasa, I. W., Ambarawati, I., Mega, I. M., & Budiasa, I. K. M. (2012). Optimizing Integrated Farming Systems to Maximize Farmer Income.Journal of Agribusiness and Agritourism, 1(2), 96–105.

BPS, 2022, Department of Agriculture and Food Crops, Denpasar.url:https://bali.bps.go.id/indicator/54/352/1/produksi-kakao-menurut-kabupaten-kota-di-provinsi-bali.html. Accessed, 29 June 2022

Fikria, F., Achmad, M., & Daniel. (2017). AgriTechno Journal.Jurnal Agritechno, 10(1), 42–49.

Fitriana, N. H., Amir, I. T., & Indah, P. N. (2020). Analysis and Development of Cocoa Agribusiness in Kare Village, Madiun District, East Java. AJARCDE | Asian Journal of Applied Research for Community Development and Empowerment, 4(2), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.29165/ajarcde.v4i2.45

Franzen, M., & Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (2007). Ecological, economic, and social perspectives on cocoa production worldwide. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16(13), 3835–3849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9183-5

George Marechera and Joseph Ndwiga. (2015). This document is discoverable and free to researchers across the globe due to the work of AgEcon Search . Help ensure our sustainability . Actors Influecing Price of Agricultural Products and Stability Cunte. AgEcon Search, 18.

Gilbert, C. L. (2016). The Dynamics of the World Cocoa Price. The Economics of Chocolate, September, 307–338. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198726449.003.0016

Gutiérrez García, G. A., Gutiérrez-Montes, I., Hernández Núñez, H. E., Suárez Salazar, J. C., & Casanoves, F. (2020). Relevance of local knowledge in decision-making and rural innovation: A methodological proposal for leveraging the participation of Colombian cocoa producers.Journal of Rural Studies, 75, 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.01.012

Hulme, M. F., Salliss, D., Konneh, M. S., Dauda, P., Witcutt, E., & Sanderson, F. J. (2018). Improving cocoa harvest can mitigate crop damage by wildlife in a forest-agriculture matrix. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 265(April), 236–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.06.019

Ministry of Agriculture. (2022).Cocoa Production by Province in Indonesia, 2017 - 2021 Cocoa Production by Province in Indonesia, 2017 - 2021. 2021, 2021.

Kongor, J. E., De Steur, H., Van de Walle, D., Gellynck, X., Afoakwa, E. O., Boeckx, P., & Dewettinck, K. (2018). Constraints for future cocoa production in Ghana.Agroforestry Systems, 92(5), 1373–1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0082-9

Mardones, C., & Hernández, A. (2017). Analysis of subsidies to the forestry sector in the Biobío region, Chile.Wood Forests, 23(2), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2017.2321494

Mason, N. M., Iapri, M. S. U., Msu, T. S. J., & Iapri, R. M. (2013). Lunduka_et_al_2013_AE (2). 1–12.

Monke, E. A., & Pearson, S. R. (1989). The policy analysis matrix for agricultural development. The Policy Analysis Matrix for Agricultural Development. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242364

Mustofa, R. (2021). http://ejurnal.binawakya.or.id/index.php/MBI Vol.15 No.11 juni 2021 Open Journal Systems. 15(11), 5667–5674.

Nappu, B., Taufik, M., & Topic, M. (2017). Bioindustry-Based Cocoa Farming Business System at the Development Center in North Luwu Regency, South Sulawesi.Journal of Agricultural Research and Development, 35(4), 187. https://doi.org/10.21082/jp3.v35n4.2016.p187-196

Ntiamoah, A., & Afrane, G. (2008). Environmental impacts of cocoa production and processing in Ghana: life cycle assessment approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(16), 1735–1740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.11.004

Nwachukwu, I. N., & Nwaru, J. C. (2015). Competitiveness and determinants of cocoa. Report and Opinion, 2(7), 51–54.

Pakpahan, A. R. H., Achmad, E., & Nizori, A. (2021). Mapping the suitability of cocoa plantations in Muaro Jambi district. J Agriculture, 9(2), 1–15. https://repository.unja.ac.id/19023/

Septianti, E., Salengke, Langkong, J., Sukendar, N. K., & Hanifa, A. P. (2020). Characteristic Quality of Pinrang’s Cocoa Beans During Fermentation Used Styrofoam Containers. Canrea Journal: Food Technology, Nutrition, and Culinary Journal, 3(1), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.20956/canrea.v3i1.235

Siagian, I. P. S., Siagian, B., & Ginting, J. (2014). Growth of cocoa seedlings (Theobroma cacao l.) by administering NPK and biological fertilizers.Online Journal of Agroecotechnology, 2(2), 447–459.

Singh, K., Fuentes, I., Fidelis, C., Yinil, D., Sanderson, T., Snoeck, D., Minasny, B., & Field, D. J. (2021). Cocoa suitability mapping using multi-criteria decision making: An agile step towards soil security. Soil Security, 5, 100019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soisec.2021.100019

Sutopo, W., Nizam, M., Purwanto, A., Atikah, N., & Putri, A. S. (2016). A cost estimation application for determining feasibility assessment of Li-Ion battery in mini plant scale. International Journal on Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 8(1), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.15676/ijeei.2016.8.1.13

Sukanteri, N. P., Lestari, P. F. K., & Amaral, N. P. A. (2023). Optimizing Resources In The Intercropping Farming System In Tabanan Regency, Bali Province. Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, 7(1), 48-59.

Utomo, B., Prawoto, A. A., Bonnet, S., Bangviwat, A., & Gheewala, S. H. (2016). Environmental performance of cocoa production from monoculture and agroforestry systems in Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134(Part B), 583–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.102

Vivek, V., Bermúdez, S., & Larrea, C. (2020). Global Market Report: Cocoa.Exchange Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal, 1–12.

Wessel, M., & Quist-Wessel, P. M. F. (2015). Cocoa production in West Africa, a review and analysis of recent developments. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 74–75, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2015.09.001

Widyatami, L. E., & Wiguna, A. A. (2019). Competitiveness and Impact of Government Policies on Rice Farming with SRI Method in Rogojampi District, Banyuwangi Regency. Agrarian, 5(2), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.18196/agr.5279

World Bank. (2016). World Bank Commodities Price Data ( The Pink Sheet ) World Bank Commodities Price Data ( The Pink Sheet ) Description of Price Series. Apr-2015, 9–11. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPROSPECTS/Resources/334934-1111002388669/829392-1420582283771/Pnk_0415.pdf

Zuidema, P. A., Leffelaar, P. A., Gerritsma, W., Mommer, L., & Anten, N. P. R. (2005). A physiological production model for cocoa (Theobroma cacao): Model presentation, validation and application. Agricultural Systems, 84(2), 195–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2004.06.015

Downloads

Published

2024-04-26

How to Cite

Sukanteri, N. P., Lestari, P. F. K., Yuniti, I. G. A. D., & Tamba, I. M. (2024). Policy and Competitiveness of Integrated Agricultural-Based technology for Cocoa Production in Indonesia: Application of a Policy Analysis Matrix. Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental, 18(9), e06441. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n9-006

Issue

Section

Artigos