Evidence on Price Formation In Financial Markets: A Multitemporal Analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n9-089

Keywords:

Green Energies, Precious Metals, Comovements, Portfolio Diversification

Abstract

Background: Although clean energy stocks have become a popular new asset class for market players, relatively little research has been done on risk management strategies for investors in clean energy stock markets. Gold and Silver are examples of precious metals typically considered suitable investments to hedge against uncertainty. Therefore, their demand tends to rise when stock markets decline.

 

Purpose: The study aims to analyse the influence of precious metals (Gold, Silver and Platinum) and green stock indices (Clean Energy Fuels, Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy, S&P Global Clean Energy, WilderHill Clean Energy) on price formation during different economic periods between 1 January 2018 and 23 November 2023.

 

Methods: The periods analysed were Tranquil, 2020 pandemic, pre-conflict and Conflict (Russian invasion of Ukraine). To this end, a VAR Granger Causality/Block Exogeneity Wald model was estimated to identify different influence patterns during each period.

 

Results: During the Tranquil period, 15 movements affecting prices were observed, with Silver significantly influencing all its peers, while Gold impacted Platinum, S&P Global, Nasdaq and WilderHill. Platinum was the asset that received the most shocks from its peers. During the 2020 pandemic, there was an increase to 26 movements, with the S&P Global and Nasdaq Clean indices influencing most of their peers. Gold and Platinum continued to be the assets most influenced by their peers. In the pre-conflict period, 11 movements were identified, with the highlight being the mutual influence between Gold, the Nasdaq and WilderHill indices, and Platinum. During this period, Silver and S&P Global only affected the price formation of Platinum and Clean Energy Fuels, respectively. During the Conflict period, 18 movements were observed, highlighting the influence of Platinum and S&P Global on the price formation of various assets. Gold was the asset that received the most shocks from its peers during this period.

 

Conclusion: the results indicate changes in the interactions between assets throughout the different economic contexts, highlighting the importance of understanding these dynamics to make more informed decisions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BenMabrouk, H., Sassi, S., Soltane, F., & Abid, I. (2024). Connectedness and portfolio hedging between NFTs segments, American stocks and cryptocurrencies Nexus. International Review of Financial Analysis, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102959

Breitung, J. (2000). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. Advances in Econometrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15006-6

Bulut, L., & Rizvanoghlu, I. (2020). Is Gold a safe haven? The international evidence revisited. In Acta Oeconomica (Vol. 70, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2020.00035

Caporale, G. M., & Gil-Alana, L. A. (2022). Gold and Silver as Safe Havens: A Fractional Integration and Cointegration Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4279173

Chen, K., & Wang, M. (2017). Does Gold act as a hedge and a safe haven for china's stock market? International Journal of Financial Studies, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs5030018

Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5606(00)00048-6

Clemente, J., Montañés, A., & Reyes, M. (1998). Testing for a unit root in variables with a double change in the mean. Economics Letters, 59(2), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(98)00052-4

Dias, R., Alexandre, P., Teixeira, N., & Chambino, M. (2023). Clean Energy Stocks: Resilient Safe Havens in the Volatility of Dirty Cryptocurrencies. Energies, 16(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/en16135232

Dias, R., Alexandre, P., Vasco, C., Heliodoro, P., & Santos, H. (2021). Random Walks and Market Efficiency: Gold, Platinum, Silver Vs Asia Equity Markets. 5th EMAN Conference Proceedings (Part of EMAN Conference Collection), October, 55–70. https://doi.org/10.31410/eman.2021.55

Dias, R., & Carvalho, L. C. (2020). Hedges and safe havens: An examination of stocks, Gold and Silver in Latin America's stock market. Revista de Administração Da UFSM, 13(5), 1114–1132. https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465961307

Dias, R., Chambino, M., Alexandre, P., Morais da Palma, C., & Almeida, L. (2023). Unveiling Bitcoin's Safe Haven and Hedging Properties Beyond Diversification (Issue November). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-9039-6.ch018

Dias, R., Horta, N., & Chambino, M. (2023a). Clean Energy Action Index Efficiency: An Analysis in Global Uncertainty Contexts. Energies 2023, 16, 18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/en16093937

Dias, R., Horta, N. R., & Chambino, M. (2023b). Portfolio rebalancing in times of stress: Capital markets vs. Commodities. Journal of Economic Analysis, 9(1), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.58567/jea02010005

Dias, R. M., Chambino, M., Teixeira, N., Alexandre, P., & Heliodoro, P. (2023). Balancing Portfolios with Metals : A Safe Haven for Green Energy Investors ? 1–21.

Dias, R. T., & Carvalho, L. (2021). The Relationship Between Gold and Stock Markets During the COVID-19 Pandemic. May, 462–475. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6643-5.ch026

Dias, R., Teixeira, N., Alexandre, P., & Chambino, M. (2023). Exploring the Connection between Clean and Dirty Energy: Implications for the Transition to a Carbon-Resilient Economy. Energies, 16(13), 4982. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16134982

Dickey, D., & Fuller, W. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057–1072. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912517

Elie, B., Naji, J., Dutta, A., & Uddin, G. S. (2019). Gold and crude oil as safe-haven assets for clean energy stock indices: Blended copulas approach. Energy, 178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.155

Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236

Erdoğan, S., Gedikli, A., Çevik, E. İ., Erdoğan, F., & Çevik, E. (2022). Precious metals as safe-haven for clean energy stock investment: Evidence from nonparametric Granger causality in distribution test. Resources Policy, 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102945

Ettinger, J., McGivern, A., Spiegel, M. P., King, B., Shawoo, Z., Chapin, A., & Finnegan, W. (2023). Breaking the climate spiral of silence: lessons from a COP26 climate conversations campaign. Climatic Change, 176(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-023-03493-5

Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791

Granger, C. W. J. (1981). Some properties of time series data and their use in econometric model specification. Journal of Econometrics, 16(1), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(81)90079-8

Gustafsson, R., Dutta, A., & Bouri, E. (2022). Are energy metals hedges or safe havens for clean energy stock returns? Energy, 244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122708

Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7

Jarque, C. M., & Bera, A. K. (1980). Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals. Economics Letters, 6(3), 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(80)90024-5

Jin, J., Yu, J., Hu, Y., & Shang, Y. (2019). Which one is more informative in determining price movements of hedging assets? Evidence from Bitcoin, gold and crude oil markets. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.121121

Kakinuma, Y. (2022). Nexus between Southeast Asian stock markets, bitcoin and Gold: spillover effect before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-02-2021-0050

Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7

Lütkepohl, H. (1993). Testing for Causation Between Two Variables in Higher-Dimensional VAR Models (Vol. 114, Issue 4, pp. 75–91). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51514-9_4

Parzen, E. (1982). ARARMA models for time series analysis and forecasting. Journal of Forecasting, 1(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3980010108

Perron, P., & Phillips, P. C. B. (1988). Testing for a Unit Root in a Time Series Regression. Biometrika, 2(75), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1992.10509923

Phillips, P. C. B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/75.2.335

Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and Reality. Econometrica, 48(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912017

Teixeira, N., Dias, R., & Pardal, P. (2022). The gold market as a safe haven when stock markets exhibit pronounced levels of risk : evidence during the China crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. April, 27–42.

Tzeremes, P., Dogan, E., & Alavijeh, N. K. (2023). Analysing the nexus between energy transition, environment and ICT: A step towards COP26 targets. Journal of Environmental Management, 326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116598

Van Asselt, H., & Green, F. (2023). COP26 and the dynamics of anti-fossil fuel norms. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.816

Downloads

Published

2024-05-06

How to Cite

Oliveira, K., Dias, R., Galvão, R., & Varela, M. (2024). Evidence on Price Formation In Financial Markets: A Multitemporal Analysis. Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental, 18(9), e06304. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n9-089

Issue

Section

Artigos