The Role of Cumulative Voting in Protecting Minority Shareholders in Listed Companies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n8-060Keywords:
Cumulative Voting, Board of Directors, Board ElectionAbstract
Objective: This article was produced due to the ongoing debate about the protection of minority shareholders in listed companies. It details the challenges faced by minority shareholders and sets out the various methods scholars have identified that can be used to protect minority shareholders.
However, some lawmakers believe that cumulative voting is a substantial improvement in the methods commonly used to protect minority shareholders. The article considers what cumulative voting is, how it differs from straight voting rights and what benefits it provides, particularly for minority shareholders. Furthermore, the article considers the effectiveness of cumulative voting as a means of protecting minority shareholders from majority shareholders and delinquent boards of directors.
Method: In writing this article, the authors compared the approach used in various countries to protect minority shareholders. They analysed the information gathered in a comparative study process to ascertain the international best practice relating to protecting minority shareholders and cumulative voting rights. At the end of this process, the article concludes with a review of the international best practices and how these may be applied in Kuwait.
Result & Conclusion: After considering the theory behind cumulative voting and the application thereof, the conclusion reached is that cumulative voting does not adequately protect minority shareholders. Furthermore, the Kuwaiti legislature has not made cumulative voting mandatory and, as a result, few, if any, companies have adopted this method of voting.
Downloads
References
Al-Shebli, A. (2021). The Legal System of Corporate Governance for Companies Listed in the Kuwait Stock Exchange (Arabization and Publishing Committee Kuwait University)
Ticker, B. (2015). Corporate Governance: Principles, Polices and Practices (3rd edn) Oxford University Press.
Mallin, C. (2013). Corporate Governance (4th edn) Oxford University Press.
Vermeulen, E. (2013) ‘Beneficial Ownership and Control: A Comparative Study - Disclosure, Information and Enforcement’ OECD Corporate Governance Working Papers 7, 8 http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/oecd-corporate-governance-working-papers_22230939
Cheeseman, H. (2013). Business Law: Legal Environment, Online Commerce, Business Ethics, and International Issues (8th edn) Pearson
Flourentzou, N. ‘Minority shareholders: Applicability of Unfair Prejudice’ (ms lawyers) https://www.mslawyers.eu/images/publication_documents/Minority_Shareholders-_Applicability_of_Unfair_Prejudice.pdf
Davies, P. (2010). Introduction to Company Law (2nd edn), Oxford University Press> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199207763.001.0001
Aboa, Z. (2009). Management of Public Institutions: Foundations of the application of administrative functions, Dar Al Shorouk
Three charged with insider dealing. (2023, April 5). FCA. http://www.fca.org.uk/news/three-charged-with-insider-dealing
M.Shambartas international corporate law practice & local legal services in Cyprus. (n.d.). http://www.mslawyers.eu/images/publication_documents/Individual_Investors-_Applicability_of_Unfair_Prejudice.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
•The author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the article in the journal; • The author(s) guarantee the contribution is original and novel, and is not under evaluation in any other publication(s); • The editorial team is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts emitted in the published texts, these being the full responsibility of the author(s); • It is reserved to the editors the right to proceed with adjustments related to the text and compliance with publication standards.