Empirical Research on Ethical Leadership and Knowledge Workers’ Innovative Behaviour: The Mediating Role of Job Autonomy

Authors

  • Hong Zhang
  • Muhammad Shahid Khan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n9-091

Keywords:

Ethical Leadership, Job Autonomy, Knowledge Workers, Innovative Behaviour

Abstract

Introduction: This research studied the mediating role of job autonomy in the relationship between ethical leadership and knowledge workers’ innovative behaviour based on self-determination theory. Data were collected from 377 knowledge workers in the IT industry in Sichuan, Henan, and Guangdong province, China. A conceptual model was constructed and tested with the statistical software SMART-PLS. This paper concludes that job autonomy effectively mediates ethical leadership and knowledge workers’ innovative behaviour. The findings also reveal the strong and positive impact of ethical leadership on knowledge workers’ innovative behaviour. This paper enriched the leadership literature and extended the understanding of the predictors of employee innovative behaviour

 

Objective: To investigate the impact of ethical leadership on knowledge workers’ innovative behaviour. To study the relationship between ethical leadership and job autonomy. To examine the impact of job autonomy on knowledge workers’ innovative behaviour. To investigate the mediating effect of job autonomy between ethical leadership and knowledge workers’ innovative behaviour.

 

Theoretical Framework: Knowledge workers are highly skilled workers with professional knowledge, good education, or experience in their respective fields (Davenport, 2006). According to Correia & Dierendonck (2010), three core elements underpin the global meaning framework of knowledge workers: first, knowledge workers perceive their work as a calling; second, they have a strong desire for membership within a community of peers; third, they demand autonomy. These elements are in consistency with SDT.    

 

Method: This research used a quantitative approach to test the hypothesis, a closed questionnaire to collect the data, and SMART PLS version 4 to analyze the data. The survey questions were translated into Chinese with a back-translation approach (Brislin, 1986), as the respondents were all Chinese.

 

Results and Discussion: Due to the single source, we first test common method bias. We adopted a full collinearity assessment approach to check the common method bias (Kock, 2015; Kock and Lynn, 2012). In this approach, the constructs were regressed on a new dummy variable with random values. As shown in table 4.1, the variance inflation factor (VIF) is lower than 3.3 (Kock, 2015), the model is indicated free of common method bias.

 

Research Implications: The study constructed a research model to investigate the mediating effect of job autonomy between ethical leadership and knowledge workers' innovative behaviour. Management in knowledge-intensive industries, like the IT industry, can gain inspiration from the research to develop proper management strategies to promote knowledge workers’ innovative behaviour while guarding the ethical line.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asif, M., Hussain, M. A., Humayun, S., Awais, M., & Li, M. (2023). Investigating the Role of Ethical Leadership on Employee Innovativeness through Bottom-Up Job Redesigning: Self-Leadership as a Catalyst. Sustainability, 15(9), 7190. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097190

Brislin, R.W. (1986). “The wording and translation of research instruments”, in Lonner, W. and Berry, J. (Eds), Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 137-164.

Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 97 (2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Second Ed.). New York: Routledge.

Coonan, C. (2016). Former Enron CFO Andrew Fastow: “You can follow all the rules and still commit fraud.” Retrieved from https://www.irishtimes.com/business/companies/former-enron-cfoandrew-fastow-you-can-follow-all-the-rules-and-still-commitfraud-1.2485821

Correia de Sousa M., van Dierendonck D. (2010). Knowledge workers, servant leadership and the search for meaning in knowledge-driven organizations. On the Horizon, 18(3), 230-239

Davenport T. H. (2006). Thinking for a living, How to get better performance and results from Knowledge Workers? Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 21-24

De Hoogh, A.H.B., Den Hartog, D.N. (2008). Ethical and despotic leadership relationships with leader’s social responsibility, top management team effectiveness, and subordinates optimism: a multi-method study. Leadership Quart. 19, 297–311.

De Spiegelaere, S., Gyes, G. and Hootegem, G. (2016). Not all autonomy is the same. Different dimensions of job autonomy and their relation to work engagement and innovative work behavior, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing and Service Industries, 26 (4). 515-527

Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M. (1985), Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior, Plenum, New York.

Feng, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Zhang, L., & Han, X. (2018). Just the Right Amount of Ethics Inspires Creativity: A Cross-Level Investigation of Ethical Leadership, Intrinsic Motivation, and Employee Creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(3), 645–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3297-1

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: A comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29(3), 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2017-0515

Gefen, David & Straub, Detmar & Boudreau, Marie-Claude. (2000). Structural equation modeling techniques and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communication of the Association for Information System, 4, 2-76.

Hahn, E. D., & Ang, S. H. (2017). From the editors: New directions in the reporting of statistical results in the Journal of World Business. Journal of World Business, 52(2), 125–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JWB.2016.12.003

Hair, J. F. et al. (2014). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): An Emerging Tool in Business Research. European Business Review, 26, 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). London: Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS‐SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Hassi, A., Rohlfer, S., & Jebsen, S. (2022). Empowering leadership and innovative work behavior: The mediating effects of climate for initiative and job autonomy in Moroccan SMEs. EuroMed Journal of Business, 17(4), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-01-2021-0010

Henseler, J., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-based Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.

Hernaus, T. and Mikulic, J. (2014). Work characteristics and work performance of knowledge workers, EuroMed Journal of Business, 9(3), 268-292.

Hu, M. L. M., Horng, J. S., & Sun, Y. H. C. (2009). Hospitality teams: knowledge sharing and service innovation performance. Tourism Management, 30(1), 41-50

Chin WW, Peterson RA, Brown PS. ( 2008). Structural equation modeling in marketing: Some practical reminders. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice.16(4):287-98.

Chughtai, A. A. (2015). Creating safer workplaces: The role of ethical leadership. Safety Science, 73, 92–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.016

Jha, J. K., & Singh, M. (2019). Exploring the mechanisms of influence of ethical leadership on employment relations. IIMB Management Review, 31(4), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2019.07.010

Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10.

Kock, N., & Lynn, G. S. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 546-580.

Lee, W. R., Choi, S. B., & Kang, S.-W. (2021). How Leaders’ Positive Feedback Influences Employees’ Innovative Behavior: The Mediating Role of Voice Behavior and Job Autonomy. Sustainability, 13(4), 1901. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041901

Liu, X., Baranchenko, Y., An, F., Lin, Z., & Ma, J. (2020). The impact of ethical leadership on employee creative deviance: The mediating role of job autonomy. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(2), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-01-2020-0026

Mai, K. M., Welsh, D. T., Wang, F., Bush, J., & Jiang, K. (2022). Supporting Creativity or Creative Unethicality? Empowering Leadership and the Role of Performance Pressure. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04784-6

Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Cheah, J.-H., Thurasamy, R., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2020). Sample Size for Survey Research: Review and Recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2), i–xx. https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.4(2)01

Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1321–1339.

Mumford MD, Scott GM, Gaddis B, Strange JM. 2002. Leading creative people: orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leader Quarterly, 13(6):705-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00158-3

Musenze, I. A., & Mayende, T. S. (2023). Ethical leadership (EL) and innovative work behavior (IWB) in public universities: Examining the moderating role of perceived organizational support (POS). Management Research Review, 46(5), 682–701. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-12-2021-0858

Oldham, G. R., & Da Silva, N. (2015). The impact of digital technology on the generation and implementation of creative ideas in the workplace. Computers in Human Behavior, 42, 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb. 2013.10.041

Peng, Z., Yang, Y., & Wu, R. (2022). The Luckin Coffee scandal and short-selling attacks. Journal of Behavioural and Experimental Finance, 34, 100629.

Piccolo, R. F., Greenbaum, R., Hartog, D. N. D., & Folger, R. (2010). The relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2–3), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.627

Purc, E., & Laguna, M. (2019). Personal Values and Innovative Behavior of Employees. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 865. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00865

Ramayah, T., Cheah, J., Chuah, F., Ting, H., & Memon, M. A. (2018). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS‐SEM) using SmartPLS 3.0: An updated guide and practical guide to statistical analysis (2nd ed). Pearson.

Resick, C.J., Hanges, P.J., Dickson, M.W., Mitchelson, J.K. (2006). A cross-cultural examination of the endorsement of ethical leadership. J. Bussines Ethics, 63, 345-359.

Scott, S.G. and Bruce, R.A. (1994), Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace, Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.

Serrat, O. (2010). Managing knowledge workers. Washington, DC: Asian Development Bank

Schwepker, C. H., & Dimitriou, C. K. (2021). Using ethical leadership to reduce job stress and improve performance quality in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94, 102860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102860

Stoffers, J. M., Van der Heijden, B. and Notelaers, G.L.A. (2014), Towards a moderated mediation model of innovative work behaviors enhancement, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 27(4), 642-659, doi: 10.1108/JOCM-05-2014-0105.

Stouten, J., van Dijke, M., Mayer, D. M., De Cremer, D., & Euwema, M. C. (2013). Can a leader be seen as too ethical? The curvilinear effects of ethical leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(5), 680–695.

Suhandiah, S., Suhariadi, F., Yulianti, P., & Abbas, A. (2023). Autonomy and feedback on innovative work behavior: The role of resilience as a mediating factor in Indonesian Islamic banks. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2178364. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2178364

Surawski, B. (2019). Who is a “knowledge worker” – clarifying the meaning of the term through comparison with synonymous and associated terms. Management, 23(1), 105–133. https://doi.org/10.2478/manment-2019-0007

Ullah, I., Rehman, K. U., Hameed, R. M., & Kayani, N. Z. (2017). Development of CSR through ethical leadership: Constructive role of ethical culture and intellectual capital. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), 11(3), 977–1004.

Wang, Z.C., &Yang, J.F. (2018). Research on the relationship among ethical leadership, psychological safety and employees’ innovative behavior. Dongyue. R., 8, 118–125.

Wen, Q., Wu, Y., & Long, J. (2021). Influence of Ethical Leadership on Employees’ Innovative Behavior: The Role of Organization-Based Self-Esteem and Flexible Human Resource Management. Sustainability, 13(3), 1359. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031359

Xiao, G.R., & Zhao, Y.J. (2017). Ethical leadership and employees’ turnover intention: Leader-member exchange as a mediator. Sci. Sci. Manag. S. T ,38, 160–171.

Ye, P., Liu, L., & Tan, J. (2023). The influence of organisational justice and ethical leadership on employees’ innovation behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(4), 1129–1149. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-08-2021-0421

Zhu, D., Lin, M.-T., Thawornlamlert, P. K., Subedi, S. (Bichitra), & Kim, P. B. (2023). The antecedents of employees’ innovative behavior in hospitality and tourism contexts: A meta-regression approach. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 111, 103474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103474

Downloads

Published

2024-05-06

How to Cite

Zhang, H., & Khan, M. S. (2024). Empirical Research on Ethical Leadership and Knowledge Workers’ Innovative Behaviour: The Mediating Role of Job Autonomy. Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental, 18(9), e06255. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n9-091

Issue

Section

Artigos