Systematic Review of the Circular Economy Performance Assessment System Under International Management Paradigms

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n9-013

Keywords:

Circular Economy, Performance Evaluation System, Systematic Review, Measures, Metrics

Abstract

Objective: To present a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) on Performance Evaluation in the Circular Economy (PECE), addressing its temporal evolution and critically analyzing the metrics found in empirical studies.

 

Theoretical Framework: The research starts from theoretical contributions on the characteristics of a metric and the levels of performance assessment systems, compared with the evolution of performance assessment in the management of natural resources until we reach the circular economy.

 

Method: Utilization of Systematic Literature Review following the Knowledge Development Process-Constructivist approach (ProKnow-C), assessing secondary data from articles comprising the Research Portfolio (RP).

 

Results and Discussion: The literature presents a variety of circularity metrics at different scales, yet there is a predominance of individual metrics and a lack of comprehensive focus on Performance Evaluation Systems (PES).

 

Research Implications: Identifies the need for more comprehensive and integrative metrics aligned with CE principles and capable of encompassing multiple levels of action. Future research has the potential to significantly enrich society by exploring the development of more comprehensive metrics, considering the interaction between levels of circularity and environmental performance.

 

Originality/Value: Highlights the growing concern with metrics in the Circular Economy (CE), identifies gaps in understanding the full impacts of each approach in the supply chain, and underscores the need for more robust and integrative metrics aligned with CE principles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baratsas, S. G., Pistikopoulos, E. N., & Avraamidou, S. (2022). A quantitative and holistic circular economy assessment framework at the micro level. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 160, 1–20.

Bititci, U., Garengo, P., Dörfler, V., & Nudurupati, S. (2012). Performance Measurement: Challenges for Tomorrow*. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(3), 305–327.

Blomsma, F. (2016). Making sense of circular economy [Imperial College London].

Blomsma, F. (2018). Collective ‘action recipes’ in a circular economy – On waste and resource management frameworks and their role in collective change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 199, 969–982.

Bonassi, P., Mango, C., & Lironi, E. (2016). Circular Economy Lab. Circular Economy Lab. https://www.circulareconomylab.it/content/circularEconomy/en.html

Boyer, R. H. W., Mellquist, A., Williander, M., Fallahi, S., Nyström, T., Linder, M., Algurén, P., Vanacore, E., Hunka, A. D., Rex, E., & Whalen, K. A. (2021). Three‐dimensional product circularity. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 25(4), 824–833.

Bracquené, E., Dewulf, W., & Duflou, J. R. (2020). Measuring the performance of more circular complex product supply chains. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 154(December 2019), 104608.

Calzolari, T., Genovese, A., & Brint, A. (2022). Circular Economy indicators for supply chains: A systematic literature review. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 13, 100160.

Cooper, S. J. G., Giesekam, J., Hammond, G. P., Norman, J. B., Owen, A., Rogers, J. G., & Scott, K. (2017). Thermodynamic insights and assessment of the ‘circular economy.’ Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 1356–1367.

De Almeida, I. T. G. V., Ribeiro, A. R. B., Floriano, L. de S., Ramalho, L. L., & De Araújo, R. S. C. (2023). Circular Economy and Reverse Logistics: a Systematic Review. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(3), 1–14.

de Oliveira, C. T., Dantas, T. E. T., & Soares, S. R. (2021). Nano and micro level circular economy indicators: Assisting decision-makers in circularity assessments. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 455–468.

Di Maio, F., & Rem, P. C. (2015). A Robust Indicator for Promoting Circular Economy through Recycling. Journal of Environmental Protection, 06(10), 1095–1104.

Elia, V., Gnoni, M. G., & Tornese, F. (2020). Evaluating the adoption of circular economy practices in industrial supply chains: An empirical analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273(122966), 1–14.

EMF, E. M. F. (2015). System diagram. EMF - Ellen MacArthur Foundation. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/pt/o-diagrama-de-borboleta

EMF, E. M. F., & Granta Design. (2015). Material Circularity Indicator (MCI). Ellen MacArthur Foundation and Granta Design. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/material-circularity-indicator

Ensslin, L., Ensslin, S. R., Lacerda, R. T. O., & Tasca, J. E. (2010). ProKnow-C, Knowledge Development Process- Constructivist. Processo técnico com patente de registro pendente junto ao INPI.

Ensslin, L., Ensslin, S. R., & Pinto, H. de M. (2013). Processo de investigação e análise bibliométrica: avaliação da qualidade dos serviços bancários. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 17(3), 325–349.

Franco, N. G., Almeida, M. F. L., & Calili, R. F. (2021). A strategic measurement framework to monitor and evaluate circularity performance in organizations from a transition perspective. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1165–1182.

Gil, A. C. (2022). Como Elaborar Projetos de Pesquisa. 7th ed. São Paulo: Grupo Gen.

Gorokhova, T., Shpatakova, O., Toponar, O., Zolotarova, O., & Pavliuk, S. (2023). Circular Economy as an Alternative to the Traditional Linear Economy: Case Study of the EU. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 17(5), 1–15.

Harris, S., Martin, M., & Diener, D. (2021). Circularity for circularity’s sake? Scoping review of assessment methods for environmental performance in the circular economy. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 172–186.

Hawken, P., Lovins, A. B., & Lovins, L. H. (2014). Capitalismo Natural: criando a próxima revolução industrial. São Paulo: Cultrix.

Laasch, O., & Conaway, R. N. (2015). Fundamentos da gestão responsável: sustentabilidade, responsabilidade e ética. São Paulo: Cengage Learning.

Linder, M., Sarasini, S., & van Loon, P. (2017). A Metric for Quantifying Product-Level Circularity. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 545–558.

Liu, J., Feng, Y., Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2018). Green supply chain management and the circular economy. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 48(8), 794–817.

Lopes, E. de J., Bouzon, M., & Carneiro Neto, M. de C. (2024). Revisão Sistemática: Tendências e desafios jurídicos contemporâneos. Sobral: CBL.

Marconi, M. de A., & Lakatos, E. M. (2022). Metodologia Científica. 8. ed. São Paulo: Atlas.

Melnyk, S. A., Bititci, U., Platts, K., Tobias, J., & Andersen, B. (2014). Is performance measurement and management fit for the future? Management Accounting Research, 25(2), 173–186.

Miatto, A., Emami, N., Goodwin, K., West, J., Taskhiri, M. S., Wiedmann, T., & Schandl, H. (2024). Australia’s circular economy metrics and indicators. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 1(1), 1–16.

Mio, C., Costantini, A., & Panfilo, S. (2022). Performance measurement tools for sustainable business: A systematic literature review on the sustainability balanced scorecard use. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(2), 367–384.

Nandi, S., Hervani, A. A., Helms, M. M., & Sarkis, J. (2021). Conceptualising Circular economy performance with non-traditional valuation methods: Lessons for a post-Pandemic recovery. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 0(0), 1–21.

Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (2005). Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(12), 1228–1263.

Oliveira, J. P., & Teixeira, R. L. P. (2023). The Circular Economy: a Case Study Approach Case Study of the Production of Metallized Briquets and Their use in Steel Blast Furnace. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 17(2), 1–20.

Park, J. Y., & Chertow, M. R. (2014). Establishing and testing the “reuse potential” indicator for managing wastes as resources. Journal of Environmental Management, 137, 45–53.

Pavel, S. (2018). Circular Economy: The Beauty of Circularity in Value Chain. Journal of Economics and Business, 1(4).

Potting, J., Hekkert, M., Worrell, E., & Hanemaaijer, A. (2017). Circular economy: measuring innovation in the product chain. Netherlands: SPBL Publishers.

Sacco, P., Vinante, C., Borgianni, Y., & Orzes, G. (2021). Circular economy at the firm level: A new tool for assessing maturity and circularity. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(9).

Shevchenko, T., Cluzel, F., Yannou, B., Shams Esfandabadi, Z., Ranjbari, M., Saidani, M., & Danko, Y. (2024). Completing the design for product circularity toolkit with hierarchical computation of circularity maturity diagram and redesign circular strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 437(December 2023), 140742.

Taranic, I., Behrens, A., & Topi, C. (2016). Understanding the Circular Economy in Europe, from Resource Efficiency to Sharing Platforms: the CEPS Framework.

Thiel, G. G., Ensslin, S. R., & Ensslin, L. (2017). Street Lighting Management and Performance Evaluation: Opportunities and Challenges. Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 15(2), 303–328.

Utrilla, P. N.-C., Górecki, J., & Maqueira, J. M. (2020). Simulation-Based Management of Construction Companies under the Circular Economy Concept—Case Study. Buildings, 10(5), 94.

Weetman, C. (2019). Economia circular: conceitos e estratégias para fazer negócios de forma mais inteligente, sustentável e lucrativa. Curitiba: Autêntica Business.

Zhu, Q., Geng, Y., & Lai, K. (2011). Environmental Supply Chain Cooperation and Its Effect on the Circular Economy Practice-Performance Relationship Among Chinese Manufacturers. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 15(3), 405–419.

Published

2024-04-26

How to Cite

Lopes, E. de J., Lima, L. S. da S., Bonilla, M. A. M., & Bouzon, M. (2024). Systematic Review of the Circular Economy Performance Assessment System Under International Management Paradigms. Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental, 18(9), e05664. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n9-013

Issue

Section

Artigos