Preferred Learning Model in Studying English as a Foreign Language During Post-Pandemic Period: Blended Learning, Online Learning, or Face to Face?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n9-088Palabras clave:
Blended Learning, Lecturer, Model, TechnologyResumen
Objective: Before and During the Covid-19 pandemic, students in Indonesia experienced face to face learning, online learning, and blended learning. Since the students have experienced those three learning models, this study was conducted to investigate the learning model that is preferred by the students during post-pandemic period and identify the reasons why they chose a particular learning model in learning English as a foreign language context.
Method: To achieve that research objective, this study was conducted by following a mixed-methods study method, the sequential explanatory design. The researchers started this study by collecting the quantitative data to identify the learning models preferred by the university students in Bali when they have an English class during post-pandemic period. Then, it was followed by collecting qualitative data to explain why the students preferred a certain learning model for the English class. The respondents of the study were 100 lecturers and 200 university students. The researchers collected the study data through questionnaires and interviews. The questionnaires were delivered using Google Forms, and the interviews via Google Meet.
Results and Discussion: The study reveals that most lecturers and students preferred the blended learning model to teach and learn English. In general, the selection of the learning model preferred by the lecturers and students was influenced by educational and health factors. Therefore, it can be concluded that the students’ preference on selecting a learning model is not influence by the educational reasons only.
Research Implications: Face to face instruction is crucial in an education process, because a real teacher-student interaction will happen through face to face instruction. Thus, blended learning is more preferable by the students than e-learning.
Originality/Value: Previous studies on blended in Indonesia were conducted to reveal the effectiveness of blended learning education for the broader use of blended learning in modern learning. Only a few studies were conducted to reveal their effectiveness in limited face-to-face learning during the post-pandemic of Covid-19. Therefore, this study mainly focused on investigating the effectiveness of blended learning during the implementation of limited-face to-face learning in Indonesia during the post-pandemic of the covid-19 pandemic. This study was necessary because the findings can guide educators to develop a more effective learning environment.
Descargas
Citas
Abidah, A., Hidaayatullaah, H. N., Simamora, R. M., Fehabutar, D., & Mutakinati, L. (2020). The Impact of Covid-19 to Indonesian Education and Its Relation to the Philosophy of “Merdeka Belajar.” Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education, 1(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.46627/sipose.v1i1.9
Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A. F. M., Phon, D. N. A. L. E., Abdullah, A., & Ming, G. L. (2020). Blended Learning Adoption and Implementation in Higher Education: A Theoretical and Systematic Review. In Technology, Knowledge and Learning (Issue 0123456789). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09477-z
Arend, B. D. (2019). Course Assessment Practices and Student Learning Strategies in Online Courses. Online Learning, 11(4), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v11i4.1712
Attard, C., & Holmes, K. (2020). An exploration of teacher and student perceptions of blended learning in four secondary mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00359-2
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Dey, P., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2019). Blended learning to improve quality of primary education among underprivileged school children in India. Education and Information Technologies, 24(3), 1995–2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9832-1
Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5
Eliyasni, R., Kenedi, A. K., & Sayer, I. M. (2019). Blended Learning and Project Based Learning: The Method to Improve Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS). Jurnal Iqra’ : Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(2), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v4i2.549
Enkenberg, J. (2001). Instructional design and emerging teaching models in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(5–6), 495–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00021-8
Gladkova, M., Ilyashenko, L., Kutepov, M., Smirnova, Z., & Vaganova, O. (2019). Development of communicative competencies of students in the context of blended learning. Amazonia Investiga, 8(18), 313–322.
Han, F., & Ellis, R. A. (2019). Identifying consistent patterns of quality learning discussions in blended learning. Internet and Higher Education, 40, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.09.002
Karim, R. A. (2018). Technology-Assisted Mind Mapping Technique in Writing Classrooms: An Innovative Approach. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i4/4146
Kearns, L. R. (2012). Student Assessment in Online Learning: Challenges and Effective Practices. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching (JOLT), 8(3), 198–208.
Liguori, E., & Winkler, C. (2020). From Offline to Online: Challenges and Opportunities for Entrepreneurship Education Following the COVID-19 Pandemic. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 3(4), 346–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127420916738
Ma, J., Li, C., & Liang, H. N. (2019). Enhancing Students’ Blended Learning Experience through Embedding Metaliteracy. Education Research International, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6791058
Maba, W., & Mantra, I. B. N. (2018). The primary school teachers’ competence in implementing the 2013 curriculum. SHS Web of Conferences, 42, 00035. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184200035
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative data analysis (illustrate). SAGE.
Nortvig, A. M., Petersen, A. K., & Balle, S. H. (2018). A literature review of the factors influencing e-learning and blended learning in relation to learning outcome, student satisfaction and engagement. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 16(1), 45–55.
Oweis, T. I. (2018). Effects of Using a Blended Learning Method on Students’ Achievement and Motivation to Learn English in Jordan: A Pilot Case Study. Education Research International, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7425924
Pisoni, G. (2019). Strategies for pan-European implementation of blended learning for innovation and entrepreneurship (I&E) education. Education Sciences, 9(2), 7–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020124
Portillo, J., & Lopez de la Serna, A. (2021). An international perspective for ‘Improving teacher professional development for online and blended learning: a systematic meta-aggregative review.’ Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 25–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09851-9
Putra, P., Liriwati, F. Y., Tahrim, T., Syafrudin, S., & Aslan, A. (2020). The Students Learning from Home Experiences during Covid-19 School Closures Policy In Indonesia. Jurnal Iqra’ : Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(2), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v5i2.1019
Rahayu, R. P., & Wirza, Y. (2020). Teachers’ Perception of Online Learning during Pandemic Covid-19. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 20(3), 392–406. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpp.v20i3.29226
Sari, D. M. M., & Prasetyo, Y. (2021). Project-based-learning on critical reading course to enhance critical thinking skills. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(2), 442–456. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i2.18407
Şentürk, C. (2021). Effects of the blended learning model on preservice teachers’ academic achievements and twenty-first century skills. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10340-y
Sudiarta, I. G. P., & Widana, I. W. (2019). Increasing mathematical proficiency and students character: Lesson from the implementation of blended learning in junior high school in Bali. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012118
Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M., & Liu, X. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 93–135. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076001093
Timmis, S., Broadfoot, P., Sutherland, R., & Oldfield, A. (2016). Rethinking assessment in a digital age: opportunities, challenges and risks. British Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 454–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3215
Wargadinata, W., Maimunah, I., Dewi, E., & Rofiq, Z. (2020). Student’s Responses on Learning in the Early COVID-19 Pandemic. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 5(1), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v5i1.6153
Widiastuti, I. A. M. S. (2018). EFL students’ writing interactions through weblog and self-assessment. International Journal of Humanities, Literature & Arts, 1, 38–45. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijhla.v1n1.32
Widiastuti, I. A. M. S., Mukminatien, N., Prayogo, J. A., & Irawati, E. (2019). Students’ Perception of Assessment and Feedback Practices: Making Learning Visible. International Journal of Sustainability, Education, and Global Creative Economy (IJSEGCE), 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1234/ijsegce.v2i1.49
Widiastuti, I. A. M. S., & Saukah, A. (2017). Formative Assessment in Efl Classroom Practices. Bahasa Dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni Dan Pengajarannya, 45(1), 050–063. https://doi.org/10.17977/um015v45i12017p050
Yeop, M. A., Yaakob, M. F. M., Wong, K. T., Don, Y., & Zain, F. M. (2019). Implementation of ICT policy (blended learning approach): Investigating factors of behavioural intention and use behaviour. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 767–782. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12149a
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Nengah Dwi Handayani, Putu Kerti Nitiasih, I Made Sutama, Ni Made Ratminingsih
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
•The author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the article in the journal; • The author(s) guarantee the contribution is original and novel, and is not under evaluation in any other publication(s); • The editorial team is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts emitted in the published texts, these being the full responsibility of the author(s); • It is reserved to the editors the right to proceed with adjustments related to the text and compliance with publication standards.
